Editor’s note: I welcome to the CVA a few dozen members who signed up at a VegFest last fall. We apologize for the delay in getting their names into our database. As a reminder, the CVA does not share or sell member e-mails or other information.
1. Activist Feedback
At Winter Jam in Fort Wayne, IN, the two volunteers reported that the box of 600 booklets went fast! Katie shared, “The people were really nice (a lot nicer than the recent circus protest) and receptive to taking the leaflets. It was raining so we got drenched but it was so worth it. I would like to continue being more active.”
2. Animal Liberation through Legislation
The abolitionist approach has several attractions, including clarity of
purpose and refusal to countenance unjust policies. Some people believe that
the abolitionist approach is the only way to secure animal liberation, but I
have raised doubts about this claim in prior essays. Whatever its merits, I
do not think the abolitionist approach is well-suited to the legislative
process.
Legislation almost always involves compromise, and compromise is not an
attribute of the abolitionist approach. The only exception is when there is
broad consensus on an issue, and that usually happens in response to a major
event, such as relief after a natural disaster. On an issue such as animal
protectionism, where there are huge industries with an interest in animal
exploitation and abuse and where a large segment of the population does not
favor animal liberation, legislation ending all animal exploitation has no
chance at passage. If we want to reduce animal ill-fare on farms and
elsewhere through legislation, then compromise will be necessary.
Nevertheless, some animal advocates believe that working through the
political process is not an efficient use of time, energy, and money. They
are often the dissatisfied by compromises resulting in watered-down
legislation. Further, while animal advocates often declare victory and go
home after legislation passes, animal exploitation industries rarely stop
trying to undermine enforcement of legislation and to pass new laws that
undercut animal protection laws. Therefore, I understand how many animal
advocates would decide to focus their activism elsewhere. However, I
disagree with those who opposing laws aimed at reducing animal ill-fare.
Supporting my position is the observation that advocates of animal
exploitation and abuse readily highlight this opposition of animal
advocates.
Many animal advocates who take the abolitionist approach focus their
attention on promoting veganism. I will discuss this next week.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
3. All-Creatures.Org Ministry