1. Activist Feedback
Robbie, who leafleted with Carole at a Casting Crowns concert in
Huntsville, AL on 4/23, writes:
I just got back from the Casting Crowns Concert. We passed out a box and
half [600 per box]. I still have almost 2 boxes of leaflets. Carole took a
box to pass out Saturday at an event near her. I noticed several people
stopped and were reading them before they went inside. Thanks again
for your help.
2. Essay: Who Are the Animals People Abuse?
Last week, I suggested that humans hold in contempt those animals people
abuse and kill. Why should this be? If humans felt perfectly entitled to
harm nonhumans, then there would be no need to also hold these nonhumans in
contempt. Most people don’t have contempt for a tree they might cut down,
because most don’t believe that trees have feelings that can be harmed in a
moral sense. I think contempt toward nonhumans reflects humans’ ambivalence
about abusing them, and those who mistreat animals recognize that doing so
raises moral concerns. Animal abuse becomes justified if animals “deserve”
such treatment.
The specific charges humans levy against animals, I think, tells us little
about animals but much about humans. People often claim that nonhumans have
unattractive attributes and use animal names as insults against humans. For
example, calling a person a “pig” indicates that they are gluttonous, a
stupid person is a “turkey,” a grotesquely fat person is a “cow,” and a
fearful person is “chicken.” These attributes do not define the named
animals, whose physical and behavioral attributes are appropriate for their
species and are conducive to survival.
Perhaps if we exposed the lies about the nature of God’s animals we could
awaken moral sensibilities that would help prevent animal abuse. I will
reflect on this more next week.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
3. This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary
Hoffman
Godly Branches Bear Fruit