If this proposal and the others put forward by the Trump administration are allowed to stand, it will be death by a thousand cuts for endangered wildlife across the country.
Image from
Jim
Robertson, Animals in the Wild
Environmental groups called a proposed rule change to the Endangered
Species Act announced by the Trump administration Friday "a disaster
for endangered species and the natural world."
The changes would also require USFS to "assign weight" to industry
claims of economic impact of a given area and exclude federal lands
essential to the recovery of species from critical habitat
protection, based on the economic interests of pollution-causing
industries.
"If this proposal and the others put forward by the Trump
administration are allowed to stand, it will be death by a thousand
cuts for endangered wildlife across the country," Bonnie Rice, a
senior campaigner for Sierra Club, said in a statement Friday.
"Critical habitat is just that—critical for species' survival and
recovery. In the face of mass extinction, and climate and health
crises worsened by habitat destruction and loss of nature, it's
essential that we protect more habitat, not less."
Democrats on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
called the decision "misguided."
"Developers and polluters could basically veto any critical habitat
protections for endangered species by claiming economic impacts,
even without proof," said Noah Greenwald, endangered species program
director at the Center for Biological Diversity. "Wildlife simply
can't survive or recover if they have no place to live, but that's
exactly what will happen if the Trump administration succeeds in
turning over the critical habitat designation process to industry."
These warnings are the latest against continuing moves by the Trump
administration to roll back environmental regulations. Environmental
Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler came under fire
Thursday for a speech in which he outlined further plans to gut
regulations of the fossil fuel industry should President Donald
Trump win a second term.
"Added together, these rules are a disaster for endangered species
and the natural world," said Greenwald. "This administration doesn't
care about anything but money, and wildlife will suffer."
Rice of the Sierra Club noted the urgency of the climate crisis and
species loss as she called for resistance to the administration's
proposed changes.
"The science is clear that we need to protect 30% of lands and
waters by 2030 to avoid the worst of the climate and extinction
crises," she said. "We cannot afford to continue ignoring science by
allowing the Trump administration's misguided and reckless attacks
on the Endangered Species Act to move forward."
Once the proposed regulations are in the Federal Register, they'll
be open for public comment.