Will Travers, Born Free USA
July 2012
I hope that the Minnesota Zoo’s decision to close its dolphin exhibit was more than just a financial one and that ethics also played a role. Perhaps the facility will focus on educational programs that do not exploit animals, such as its current exhibit that features 15 animatronic dinosaurs.
I was intrigued by the Minnesota Zoo’s recent announcement that it is
discontinuing its captive dolphin exhibit. More than a decade ago we
expressed concern about the zoo’s acquisition of two dolphins from South
Africa. In our letter we asked the zoo to instead consider phasing out the
captive dolphin display.
We are thrilled to see that the zoo may finally be heeding our advice.
Better late than never.
Whether wild-caught or captive-born, dolphins in captivity are sentenced to
a life of confinement, deprived of normal social and environmental
interaction that they would otherwise enjoy. Barren tanks simply cannot meet
the needs of these highly intelligent and active animals.
There are an estimated 410 dolphins in captivity in the United States.
Marine mammal inventory reports maintained by the National Marine Fisheries
Service show that the Minnesota Zoo had three wild-caught dolphins in its
exhibit.
While the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) makes it more difficult to
capture marine mammals from the wild, aquariums can and sometimes do apply
for permits to import animals from other countries where wild capture is
still common.
After passage of the MMPA in 1972, the captive marine mammal industry placed
much emphasis on captive breeding to keep the tanks full with endearing
performers and to avoid bad public relations associated with wild capture.
But without wild capture, the supply does not appear to be keeping up with
the demand. The Minnesota Zoo suggested that both the expense and difficulty
of obtaining dolphins were reasons for discontinuing the dolphin exhibit.
Born Free USA would like to believe that public support for captive displays
of marine mammals is also waning. We hope this is the case throughout the
world.
Earlier this month, a facility in Germany announced that it would
discontinue its dolphin exhibit, citing an inability to provide an adequate
environment for the animals. Once it closes, there will be just two places
in Germany that keep dolphins in captivity.
In March, the Swiss government passed measures that will end the keeping of
dolphins and whales in captivity. Bans on captive dolphins are already in
place in Norway, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Cyprus.
And it was public support for keeping wildlife in the wild that made
possible the Born Free Foundation’s rescue, rehabilitation and eventual
release of two dolphins, Tom and Misha, who had been at death’s door in a
filthy swimming pool at a resort in Hisaronu, Turkey.
I hope that the Minnesota Zoo’s decision to close its dolphin exhibit was
more than just a financial one and that ethics also played a role. Perhaps
the facility will focus on educational programs that do not exploit animals,
such as its current exhibit that features 15 animatronic dinosaurs.
The Minnesota Zoo also could be reinvented to serve as a rehabilitation
facility for native wildlife and a permanent home with spacious “natural as
possible” enclosures for those individuals who cannot be returned to the
wild.
Captive animal displays represent a less-enlightened time when animals were
viewed as objects for our amusement with no regard to their physical and
psychological well-being. Through satellite, 3D, virtual-reality and IMAX
technology, visitors can “experience” life in the farthest-flung corners of
the globe and learn about real conservation issues and solutions “from the
source” via experts on the ground where projects are being undertaken.
We must teach future generations that it is not acceptable to exploit
animals and nature. Keep wildlife in the wild.
Return to Animal Rights Articles